JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 22, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-460/97
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Análisis exclusivo de la sentencia proferida por la Corte
  • Causal de procedencia
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

No se declaró la nulidad de la Sentencia T-460/97 de la Corte Constitucional porque la única razón para que prosperara una presunta nulidad de sentencia de revisión sería la de modificación de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional o cuando ha habido violación al debido proceso en la sentencia misma.

Sobre el caso concreto, la Corte explicó que cuando surgen discrepancias sobre los temas controvertidos en una tutela y en la Sala de Revisión se impone la decisión de la mayoría, no puede luego venir a replantearse el análisis probatorio o de los temas de derecho por cuanto ya fueron definidos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. administrando justicia en nombre del pueblo y pro autoridad de la Constitución
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. NO DECLARAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-460 proferida el 24 de septiembre de 1997 pro la Sala Segunda de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.